Part 5/9:
Paul emphasizes that even when he disconnects his experimental setup, the magnetic or residual force persists. He notes that moving the shim requires deliberate effort, indicating that the device isn't just a simple temporary magnetization but might involve a more complex or stable magnetic configuration. This suggests that energy or magnetic influence remains in the system, potentially supporting the idea of a perpetual motion machine.
He proposes that Leedskalnin’s design could be reduced to its core elements—perhaps just a magnetized bar and U-shaped structure—capable of maintaining their state indefinitely, or at least with minimal energy input.