Part 5/7:
The speaker explores possible explanations, including the idea that the Postal Service might have accidentally or intentionally delivered the package back to the UK. They entertain the less likely notion of clandestine government interference, propelled perhaps by the metal samples' potential to cause issues—implying that these materials might be considered sensitive or dangerous.
This speculation leads to a recounting of past similar incidents, such as when samples were lost, ripped open, or stolen—some of which involved government officials or unknown agents. The speaker recalls gifting samples to a U.S. congressman in 2006, who never received them, raising suspicions about potential theft or interception.