Part 9/10:
This examination underscores the scientific inconsistencies in flat Earth claims regarding celestial distances, angular size, atmospheric effects, and physical laws. The arguments that celestial bodies are close and that atmospheric refraction can vastly magnify objects do not hold up under scrutiny. The evidence from astronomy, physics, and atmospheric science consistently supports a spherical Earth with celestial bodies at vast distances, behaving in predictable ways that flat Earth models cannot plausibly replicate.