Part 7/8:
He emphasizes that change in Bitcoin is slow and deliberate—a reflection of its democratic ethos, which may appear inefficient compared to centralized organizations. But this inefficiency is a price paid for maintaining freedom and decentralization. Andreas advocates for embracing this "inefficiency" as a necessary sacrifice for safeguarding the values that make Bitcoin revolutionary.
Conclusion: Freedom Through Democracy in Blockchain
Andreas concludes by firmly asserting that the strength of Bitcoin and the broader blockchain movement lies in its democratic, open approach. Instead of seeking efficiency through centralization, the system's resilience is built on the messy, inclusive process of consensus and debate.