Part 5/10:
The core issue isn't just speech or words that offend—it's the actual physical force that can be justified under certain circumstances. The line between rhetoric and violence is clear: while words alone don't harm, when they incite others to physically attack, they cross a moral and legal boundary. However, some liberals have begun to justify violence based on subjective interpretations of speech. For example, incidents where individuals confront others over their political beliefs often escalate to trespassing or threats, illustrating how heated discourse can turn personal and aggressive.