Part 7/10:
The media and political discourse are often polarized, presenting a false dichotomy. On one side, critics emphasize the dangers of executive overreach and abuse of power, often framing the issue around potential presidential overreach. On the other side, defenders focus solely on the cartels’ threat, advocating for aggressive military action without acknowledging legal or ethical limits.
Both perspectives neglect nuance. The reality requires balancing national security with checks and balances—an approach that recognizes the severity of the threat while safeguarding democratic principles. A middle ground could involve targeted military actions in international waters, where law enforcement cannot act alone and where clear congressional mandates can be established.