Part 2/12:
The discussion begins with a philosophical premise: the spread of truth in matters of general concern is vital to the stability of a republic. Without the freedom to openly debate policies—such as war—there is a risk that misguided or oppressive actions might go unchecked. When opposition is suppressed, and pro-war voices are given unchecked prominence, the democratic process becomes compromised. The question posed is whether a peaceful president could be prevented from making an early, just peace if all dissenting voices are silenced.