Part 3/13:
Milo reflects on how environmental and archaeological mysteries are often exploited not just for entertainment or curiosity but to promote a particular worldview. He notes that supporters do not seek rigorous debate but thrive on a dichotomy: Hancock as a rebellious truth-teller versus the supposed oppression by establishment science. This binary discourages critical thinking and fosters distrust, turning the series into propaganda rather than education.
His attempts to engage Hancock directly, including email outreach for an interview, highlight a willingness to promote honest discourse. Yet, Hancock's refusal to participate symbolizes his reliance on spectacle and mystique rather than empirical evidence.