Part 3/7:
In addressing these issues, Mayorkas alludes to the complexities inherent in any large organization, especially within a government structure where divergent opinions are prevalent. He suggests that while there may be differing views on policy measures, the decisions ultimately made require a demonstration of unity. The implication is that there can be personal disagreements about the best course of action, yet all involved must present a cohesive front.
This notion prompts questions about accountability, especially when such a significant decision as immigration reform is on the table. Mayorkas's hesitance to engage deeply in the deliberative process hints at a reluctance to attribute direct responsibility for the failures or challenges that have arisen.