Part 3/6:
The critique emphasizes that the historical context behind American involvement in the canal is often overlooked. The U.S. invested heavily in its construction, both financially and in terms of human lives, and thus rights to utilize it as intended should be prioritized. The argument is made that it's fundamentally unacceptable for American vessels to pay higher transit fees than those from other countries, particularly in light of America's significant contributions to the Canal's existence.