Part 2/7:
One critique centers on Penrose’s notion of algorithms. Critics argue that he incorrectly frames the concept and sets an unattainable standard for defining human thought processes. This raises questions about the feasibility of algorithms, particularly in complex domains like chess, where no existing algorithm guarantees perfect play. Yet, despite the absence of a 'master algorithm,' computers can effectively engage in the game by employing numerous well-crafted algorithms tailored to legality and strategies.