Part 4/13:
The dominance of a singular narrative in Ivy League settings results in an oppressive environment for students who dare to think differently. With faculty members often selected based on ideological compatibility rather than academic merit, the focus has shifted from the merit of ideas to the necessity of aligning with a prevailing orthodoxy.
This ideological capture manifests in oppressive classroom environments, where skepticism is quashed. The risk of being branded as contrarian can lead to students expressing less of their true opinions, opting instead to echo the dogma of their professors. The fear of being labeled "too skeptical" suggests an alarming trend where critical thought is dismissed and ideological purity is celebrated.