Part 2/8:
Zeldin was directly confronted about the notion that eliminating certain funding for lead removal from water supplies was a waste. The agitated congressman argued that the suggestion implied a disregard for public health, which Zeldin categorically denied. He affirmed that the agency’s mission to remove lead from water is of utmost importance and is a core responsibility.
After this exchange, the dialogue pivoted towards the larger implications of the current administration's approach to governance, particularly regarding environmental policies and financial oversight. Zeldin defended the administration's stance, emphasizing a commitment to accountability and fiscal responsibility for taxpayer money.