Part 8/10:
As the dialogue navigated the complicated landscape of technological regulation, Harris expressed skepticism about the effectiveness of existing governing bodies, citing the disparities between the speed of technological advancement and legislative slowdowns. He articulated the urgent need for policymakers to adapt rapidly to ensure AI is both regulated and responsibly developed.
While the race in AI development is evident, Harris made the case for a balanced approach that prioritizes governance alongside technological competition. He discussed how the current regulatory perspective is misaligned — aiming to preempt state regulations without proposing robust federal alternatives, effectively leaving AI companies to operate with negligible oversight.