Part 3/14:
Rather than confront people confrontationally, Walsh emphasizes that he intentionally asked basic, straightforward questions such as, "What is a woman?" or, "What does identifying as a woman mean?" This approach was designed to expose the illogical premises at the core of gender activism. Walsh points out that many advocates could not define what a woman is anymore, with some resorting to self-perception or identity language that dissolved into incoherence when pressed further. He highlights how even politicians advocating for 'equality' or 'rights' became visibly uncomfortable or stormed out when pressed on these definitions, exemplified by the California Congressman Mark Tano.