Part 4/11:
Historically, journalists have been cautious about overtly labeling individuals or protests in inflammatory terms. There was a time when calling someone a white supremacist or linking them directly to racist motives could lead to legal repercussions, including libel suits. As a result, media outlets relied on concrete evidence—behavioral markers or explicit statements—before making such assertions.
However, recent shifts suggest that the boundaries of responsible reporting have blurred. The political climate and social media amplify narratives swiftly, often prioritizing compelling or sensational stories over nuanced truth. Particularly in chaotic post-George Floyd protests, where cities experienced rioting, arson, and widespread chaos, the media's portrayal became increasingly polarized.