Part 4/13:
The conversation then tackles the concept of what constitutes consent and the absurdity of certain political and social statements. A historical reference surfaces—a senator claiming that "a woman can't and shouldn't be raped unless she submits"—highlighting how ignorance and harmful ideologies persist in public discourse. The speaker reflects on how free speech has become entangled with social consequences, and how platforms amplify controversial opinions into mob justice, exemplified by the cancellation of figures like Mario Lopez for merely expressing personal beliefs. The core concern is the suppression of speech—the idea of thought crime, echoing Orwellian fears.