Part 6/8:
Proponents argue that if reducing work hours can maintain or even increase productivity—potentially up to 110%—then such reforms could revolutionize work-life balance and economic efficiency. They posit that a happier workforce translates into higher productivity, challenging traditional notions of work intensity and hours.
However, skeptics highlight that this model may not be universally applicable across all sectors. Certain industries or roles may inherently require longer hours or cannot adapt to reduced workweeks without significant adjustments. Consequently, the idea of government-mandated change for all sectors appears impractical; tailored approaches might be necessary to realize benefits without unintended negative consequences.