Part 6/9:
Australia's stance, as presented by officials, is also called into question. The government’s messaging centers on being part of a united international voice advocating for peace. However, critics argue that these declarations are largely symbolic. The real influence on a conflict of this magnitude, they contend, comes from on-the-ground realities rather than statements made in capital cities or international forums.
The United States and other major powers are noted to be prioritizing domestic political considerations, with policies driven by internal politics rather than genuine solutions. The emphasis on symbolic gestures, critics argue, diminishes the potential for real peace negotiations, which require nuanced diplomacy and patience.