Part 8/9:
Furthermore, many believe that higher courts—namely the appellate courts and possibly the Supreme Court—will intervene, reversing a conviction rooted in unreliable testimony and questionable evidence. The seemingly orchestrated nature of the prosecution has led many to call the trial a "kangaroo court" lacking integrity.
Conclusion: A Political Circus with Legal Consequences
As the courtroom revelations continue to unfold, it becomes increasingly clear that the case against Trump is rooted more in political maneuvering than concrete legal grounds. Cohen’s admissions of theft and his inconsistent testimony have critically weakened the prosecution’s case, raising serious doubts about the evidence’s validity.