You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2025-08-30 07:23

in LeoFinancelast month

Part 4/12:

The fact that Cohen made the payment secretly, taking a home equity loan behind his wife’s back, underscores its potential motives—possibly personal or other non-campaign reasons—diluting the case's focus on campaign finance laws.


The Central Question: Was the Payment a Campaign Violation?

Prosecutors argue that Trump's payment of hush money to Stormy Daniels was a campaign finance violation. However, the defense and some legal analysts point out crucial flaws in this claim:

  • No Designation as a Campaign Expense: The payment was not labeled as a campaign expense at the time, and it was only mischaracterized after the election.