Part 9/11:
The discussion culminates in concerns about the broader implications of cancel culture. Neon questioned whether companies can legally divert royalties or if they’re acting out of moral obligation—highlighting how social media mobs can effectively blackmail publishers into silence or punishment.
He also pointed out that the original statements from the publisher indicated full responsibility for the situation, yet ultimately only the author’s royalties were redirected to charity. This inconsistency raised questions about the ethics of punishing individuals financially while keeping the profits.