Part 6/8:
Moreover, Antar reveals that all mortgage documents across James's properties, which she has signed over the past 42 years, contain falsified information. This pattern of consistent misrepresentation suggests a deliberate effort to conceal true ownership details and financial liabilities.
The Significance of the Case
Antar stresses that the case against James is straightforward—a clear instance of mortgage fraud and misreporting—making it more than just a political controversy. Given the nature of the evidence, legal experts consider the case "a slam dunk" for prosecutors. Yet, Antar also warns that this is likely just one chapter in a broader investigation, with more properties and potential misdeeds to be uncovered.