Part 6/12:
Media figures and political commentators have been vocal in criticizing the selective application of justice. MSNBC’s coverage, for example, has been scrutinized for its perceived bias, with commentators emphasizing that the focus on Trump’s alleged misstatements contrasts sharply with what they see as more severe and politicized investigations against Democrats like James. Critics argue that no one is truly independent anymore, with accusations of weaponized justice and selective enforcement.
Moreover, social media users point out the irony of James's campaign rhetoric—often claiming that “powerful people cheat”—amidst her own legal woes. This perceived double standard fuels skepticism about whether these charges are driven by genuine concern or political vendettas.