Part 4/6:
Penn’s refusal to sign the federal compact is significant within the wider context of debates over the role of government in higher education and the extent to which institutions should align with federal policies. Critics of the compact argue that it could impose undue restrictions on academic freedom, influence curriculum choices, or limit institutional independence. Conversely, supporters claim that participation could foster closer ties with the federal government and open doors to vital funding.
The decision by Penn, alongside the other two institutions that also declined, signals a cautious approach towards federal involvement that might threaten academic independence. As more universities assess similar offers, Penn’s stance could influence future positions within the sector.