Part 13/15:
At the core of the case is Robinson’s refusal to give his phone passcode. In the context of activism and journalism, this refusal is rooted in protecting sources and maintaining journalistic integrity. Robinson argues that the government had no lawful grounds to seize or search his device, framing it as illegal surveillance and intimidation.
Robinson’s confidence in the legal outcome stems from past experiences, where courts have previously acted unlawfully against him despite insufficient evidence. He references a particular judge, Jamie Sawyer, alleging ideological bias and preferential treatment towards certain migrant populations, which he believes compromises judicial impartiality.