Part 8/12:
The pivotal question boils down to trust: Do we place our confidence in the messy yet accountable human community or in the cold, precise logic of AI? This dilemma is encapsulated in what scholars now term the AI credibility paradox.
While Groipedia aims to build a more objective knowledge base, AI systems—particularly large language models—have demonstrated troubling flaws. They can hallucinate facts, propagate conspiracy theories, or praise notorious figures like Hitler, revealing deep-seated vulnerabilities. For instance, recent studies indicate that AI summarizing scientific papers makes factual errors in roughly 30% of cases, raising serious concerns about reliability.