You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2025-10-20 13-09

in LeoFinance5 hours ago

Part 2/10:

Zach, commenting on the severity, mentioned that "the one good thing about this is there was probably less than 10% methane load, so this could have been much worse." SpaceX later issued an official statement indicating that the failure likely originated from a composite overwrapped pressure vessel (COPV) containing gaseous nitrogen in the nose cone area of Starship. Despite the damage, SpaceX clarified that the pressure vessels used in Starship are not same as those in Falcon rockets, implying that this issue is specific and not a systemic problem affecting their Falcon program.