Part 3/16:
Gaglaniano highlighted the meticulous efforts involved in securing the crime scene, gathering evidence, and piecing together the suspect’s movements. Despite the collection of DNA, fingerprints, and digital evidence—including extensive cell phone footage and campus security recordings—remaining uncertainties linger. Notably, the suspect’s demeanor and the apparent ease with which he executed the shooting suggest that he was likely an amateur rather than a highly trained assassin. This undercuts some early sensational reports, clarifying that the attack did not require exceptional marksmanship but rather opportunistic luck and basic skill.