Part 5/8:
He questioned how a last-minute judicial ruling could permit a protest that, in practice, paralyzed critical transportation arteries, warning that such leniency might set a dangerous precedent. Tuler expressed apprehension that other groups might now consider similar disruptive protests, potentially leading to further chaos.
The Resource Implications and Future of Protests
Tuler decried the costly resource expenditure required to manage these protests, noting that police and emergency services had dedicated significant personnel and efforts to contain the demonstration. He argued that the state’s taxpayers should not bear the financial burden of ongoing protests, especially given the scale and disruption involved.