Part 5/7:
The Denial of Harm and the Suppression of Debate
Critics argue that Minister Gallagher’s rhetoric reflects a disturbing trend where open debate on gender identity laws is stifled under the guise of preventing harm. The very bill she condemns was intended to restore women’s sex-based rights—rights that are arguably more critical than ever amid ongoing debates about gender inclusivity. The refusal to debate these issues, critics contend, signals a concerning shift towards silencing dissent and undermining democratic discussion.