Part 5/10:
Supporters stressed the need for caution, citing the advice of the eSafety Commissioner, and wanted to understand what had changed in the policy rationale since the last parliament’s decision, which excluded YouTube for its educational benefits. They expressed concern over social media companies' roles in restricting access and their moral responsibility.
Some questioned whether legislation was necessary at all, suggesting that social media platforms already possess the technology—such as AI—to protect children. Critics argued that social media companies profit from targeting young users with advertising, and thus lack the moral compass to self-regulate effectively.