Part 4/15:
However, critics have expressed serious concerns. The UN, the Red Cross, and other organizations cite fears that GHF's involvement compromises neutrality, especially given the organization's involvement with government actors during a conflict zone. Technological measures such as biometric screening and facial recognition, introduced by GHF, raise alarm over mass surveillance and privacy violations—particularly the risk of Palestinian targeting by Israeli security forces.
Furthermore, aid distribution’s geographical skew towards southern Gaza complicates access for residents in the north, raising the specter of coercive displacement. Despite these concerns, GHF is operational, with two sites active and more planned.