Part 9/10:
The most noteworthy element of the story, according to the hosts, is the Macron lawyers’ characterization of Owens's theories as "preposterous." They highlight the dictionary definition of "preposterous"—something contrary to reason and utterly foolish—and suggest it might be a veiled critique of Owens’s claims. The irony is palpable: are the Macrons genuinely calling accusations of gender identity fabrication "absurd," or are they dismissing concerns rooted in gender and identity issues as equally absurd? This raises deeper questions about the boundaries of free speech, truth, and the limits of political humility.