Part 4/10:
Critics argue that the Obama administration pursued a narrative linking Donald Trump to Russian interference—a claim widely scrutinized and largely discredited over time. The narrative, they suggest, was manufactured, relying on questionable evidence like the Steele dossier, which has since been exposed as unreliable.
The discussion highlighted that much of the investigation into Russian collusion was based on flawed or partisan intelligence, which aimed to undermine Trump’s presidency. The speakers expressed concern that these actions have had lasting repercussions, notably casting a shadow over the legitimacy of Trump’s initial election victory and fueling deep partisan divides.