Part 8/9:
As the debate heats up over whether any officials involved should be held accountable, some voices emphasize the importance of transparency and justice. Advocates argue that those responsible for orchestrating false narratives or abusing intelligence should pay a price. However, the legal landscape complicates these aspirations.
Given the protections afforded to presidents under Supreme Court rulings, many believe that prosecuting former officials or presidents for alleged misconduct connected to intelligence or election interference may be highly unlikely. The immunity established ensures that, despite the volume of allegations, many allegations may not yield legal consequences.