Part 6/9:
Despite its beauty and significance, Chorley Park faced criticism almost from the outset. Critics questioned the enormous expenses involved and doubted whether such extravagance was justified for a vice-regal residence. During the Great Depression, these concerns intensified, as economic hardship made the palace’s upkeep seem increasingly insensible.
Public opinion shifted dramatically in the 1930s. The house, once a symbol of provincial pride, was increasingly seen as a costly symbol of excess. Politicians exploited this sentiment; Mitchell Hepburn, an influential populist politician, campaigned on promises to curb government spending. After his electoral victory in 1934, he targeted Chorley Park for closure and austerity measures.