Part 9/11:
Spicer criticized this pattern as potentially indicative of a cover-up. In his view, the Fifth Amendment's application in these cases—involving individuals who could have simply provided non-judgmental, straightforward answers—raises suspicion. He argued that, unlike medical confidentiality, the Fifth Amendment should not be invoked for routine questions about fitness for duty or conduct unless there is a fear of self-incrimination.
He further questioned whether this pattern of refusal is isolated or part of a broader effort to obscure the truth. Continuous use of the Fifth could signify deeper issues within the Biden administration, suggesting a deliberate effort to avoid accountability.