Part 4/5:
Further criticism points to what observers see as moral bankruptcy in the current foreign policy framework. A commentator suggests that a sensible approach would be to call on Hamas to surrender as a way to end the suffering in Gaza. Such a stance emphasizes negotiation and a pragmatic solution tailored toward ending violence, rather than taking sides or exacerbating tensions.
Instead, the government’s approach is described as worse, with allegations of inconsistency and double standards. Critics note that Australia has been more critical of the United States' tariffs than of China’s spymaster activities—highlighting a perceived lack of courage and strategic clarity.