Part 4/6:
If key findings lack broad support among the commissioners, the validity of any resulting policy recommendations becomes highly questionable. A recommendation based on contested or unsupported facts is inherently unstable and possibly invalid. This revelation casts doubt on the entire process, suggesting that decisions may be driven by incomplete or biased information rather than an objective evidentiary basis.
Flaws in the Commission’s Methodology
Further criticism points to the procedural shortcomings of the commission itself. Notably, it failed to engage in a comprehensive investigation of assertions made—either dismissing alternative perspectives or failing to verify facts through primary sources.