Part 11/13:
Media critics warn that the bill relies on a vague definition of what constitutes “disinformation,” with enforcement potentially selecting political opponents for silencing. The legislation echoes regimes in the UK, raising concerns about censorship and government overreach, especially given how easily “hate speech” and “disinformation” can be politicized.
State-based opposition is mounting, with legal challenges alleging violations of First Amendment rights. Privacy advocates and free speech defenders warn this could set a dangerous precedent for other jurisdictions.