Part 5/7:
Despite his optimistic stance, critics dismiss Sliwa’s candidacy as lacking seriousness or innovation. Comments suggest that he is aware of the slim chances of victory, hinting, "Wow. He already has the line down, right? He's planning on losing." These remarks highlight the perception that some see him more as a protest figure or a voice of dissent rather than a serious contender.
Furthermore, it's noted that Sliwa was the Republican nominee who faced defeat four years prior, losing by a significant margin of 40 points. His campaign, characterized by what some describe as "old-fashioned, cranky, dumb," is criticized for lacking fresh ideas or strategic innovation. The critique underscores a broader concern that current political strategies may not resonate with the modern electorate.