Part 7/8:
He also contrasted this approach with the Biden administration’s record, noting that four years ago, during Trump's tenure, similar aggressive measures—such as targeted strikes and interdiction—appeared more frequent or assertive. Wolf implied that the legal justification for such operations under the Trump administration was clear and well-founded, prompting a debate over whether similar actions are adequately justified today.
Political Debate and Public Support
Finally, the discussion touched upon political dynamics, with Wolf criticizing how some Democrats have questioned the legality of Trump-era strategies. He argued that, in reality, these measures are lawful and necessary to protect U.S. citizens from drug-related violence and death.