Part 6/10:
He pointed out that many of the allegations made by Merante could not withstand legal scrutiny, especially given the First Amendment protections for commentary and satire. Coleman also emphasized that the claims about Smash JT’s motives—such as making money from his content—were unfounded and that pursuing legal action could be costly for Merante, especially if she proceeded under anti-SLAPP laws (Strategic Lawsuit Against Public Participation). These laws are designed to prevent trivial or frivolous lawsuits intended to suppress free speech.