Part 4/5:
Given this context, some experts believe that Ukraine's decision to go on the offensive was driven by the necessity to do something rather than accept a prolonged stalemate. The strategic calculus appears to revolve around breaking the deadlock before Russian forces could exert further attrition. Ukraine needed to attempt an active push to possibly weaken the defenses or find gaps that could be exploited.
This move, while risky, is understood as a proactive effort to alter the dynamics of the conflict rather than a passive waiting game that could result in ongoing Russian attrition. Essentially, Ukraine's leadership seems to have judged that some form of offensive was necessary to change the status quo, despite the formidable Russian defenses.