Part 6/9:
The Broader Question of Institutional Sovereignty
A critical point raised in this debate is whether Harvard operates as a true American institution or as a semi-autonomous entity with globalist tendencies akin to the United Nations. Critics argue that Harvard has, at times, acted as a “stateless zone,” prioritizing international prestige and ideological pursuits over allegiance to the United States.
This perception raises uncomfortable questions about the university's role in the American landscape. Some worry that Harvard's international engagement—while beneficial in fostering global connections—may undermine its accountability to U.S. laws and interests.