You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2025-11-18 17-41

in LeoFinance6 days ago

Part 5/12:

Critics of the movement argue that its underlying intent borders on manipulation and entitlement. The idea that women should contribute financially but still expect men to pay all bills—while women may "play" with money as they please—paints a picture of an unbalanced, transactional dynamic. There's concern that these narratives promote selfishness and a lack of genuine relationship commitment.

Furthermore, some see this as a backlash against the progress women have made in workforce participation and independence. As women increasingly become equals (or even surpass men) in earning power, this movement appears to push for a reversal—placing men in a position of emotional or financial dependence while encouraging women to be the ones in charge.


The Economic Context