Part 6/12:
What made this deeply unsettling was Perry's counterclaim, demanding nearly $5 million to cover damages from court proceedings—aiming to recoup alleged losses from her inability to use the property for a planned bed-and-breakfast venture. The hosts expressed outrage at the unethical nature of the case, criticizing Perry's apparent vindictiveness and the judicial system’s perceived misjudgment, especially considering Wescott’s deteriorating health.
This segment painted a vivid picture of corporate greed, cynicism, and the tragic exploitation of vulnerable individuals—prompting viewers and hosts alike to express frustration and moral disapproval.