Part 10/16:
Amidst these military concerns, some argue that the ongoing narrative is designed to undermine presidential authority and foster confusion within the military. Experts warn of a coordinated campaign aimed at doubt and hesitation within the chain of command, echoing fears of a soft coup or efforts to weaken the Commander-in-Chief’s position.
Furthermore, critics contend that legislative oversight has been bypassed, and that international legal standards are at risk of being ignored in pursuit of aggressive tactics. The debate continues over whether the military’s actions are justified or if they risk turning into illegal acts of war under international law.