You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: LeoThread 2025-11-29 02-36

in LeoFinance12 days ago

Part 5/8:

The controversy deepened further when fans took to Wikipedia to catch and document the discrepancy. After intense edits and community debates, the site attempted to modify Kiat Mundi’s recorded birth year from a fixed date to an approximate range—does this suggest an effort to cover up or justify the mistake?

Additionally, considering Kiat Mundi’s species, the Cerean, renowned for their short lifespans—typically less than a hundred years—seeing a Cerean as old as 200+ years is highly inconsistent with the species' biology. This has led to widespread ridicule and frustration among fans, who see it as a blatant disregard for established lore.


Franchise Erosion and Audience Frustration